no-extra-label
Disallow unnecessary labels
Some problems reported by this rule are automatically fixable by the --fix
command line option
This rule is currently frozen and is not accepting changes.
If a loop contains no nested loops or switches, labeling the loop is unnecessary.
A: while (a) {
break A;
}
You can achieve the same result by removing the label and using break
or continue
without a label.
Probably those labels would confuse developers because they expect labels to jump to further.
Rule Details
This rule is aimed at eliminating unnecessary labels.
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
/*eslint no-extra-label: "error"*/
A: while (a) {
break ;
}
B: for (let i = 0; i < 10; ++i) {
break ;
}
C: switch (a) {
case 0:
break ;
}
Examples of correct code for this rule:
/*eslint no-extra-label: "error"*/
while (a) {
break;
}
for (let i = 0; i < 10; ++i) {
break;
}
switch (a) {
case 0:
break;
}
A: {
break A;
}
B: while (a) {
while (b) {
break B;
}
}
C: switch (a) {
case 0:
while (b) {
break C;
}
break;
}
When Not To Use It
If you don’t want to be notified about usage of labels, then it’s safe to disable this rule.
Related Rules
Version
This rule was introduced in ESLint v2.0.0-rc.0.